While researching a little for my LOW article, I came across these YouTube videos:
Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0ZS9sT2fwc&eurl=http://www.westernchanfellowship.org/sheng-yen.html
Part II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2-7OV2Ma6g&feature=related
Part III: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZjI0h8u4nw&feature=related
Friday, June 20, 2008
Saturday, June 14, 2008
DC Topics for 2008/2009 - Please comment!!
Hi guys,
Today Puay Kim, Shiongwei, Hidayat and I met up at National Library to mull over a whole series of Dharma Circle topics for next 2 semesters. We took into account Meifei, Angita and Tionghan's suggested topics.
So the next 4 DC topics aimed at incoming freshmen and returning members are:
1) Transitions in Life
Specifically dealing with the transition to University Life. Though not overtly harping on Buddhism as the panacea, the speaker will share on her own experiences on life's transitions, the mindset changes involved, and how to she helped herself with Dharma.
Suggested speaker: Cindy
2) What is Buddhism?
Specifically pitched at an audience with zero knowledge of Buddhism. The ideal end point is to clarify Buddhism in a modern way that is relevant to the audience so that they can come and find out more.
Suggested speaker: Kwek
3) Fact or Fiction: Tales of the Buddha
Introducing the life of the Buddha as a continuation from the previous topic. Different snapshots of various scenes from traditional stories of the Buddha will be brought up for discussion. With pictures of pilgrimages to present historical evidence to contrast against seemingly mythical accounts, the speaker will explore deeper meanings behind these stories.
Suggested speaker: Shiongwei
4) Calmness amidst the Stress
Mindfulness and living in the present moment is one of the top selling products of Buddhism. The speaker will share on the calmness factor in Buddhism: how it can help to keep the student in balance and equanimity amidst the building stress ahead of the first mid-term tests and looming projects.
Suggested speaker: Wee Heng
Those are NOT the actual titles, just the theme of the topic. More sexy titles are welcome as long as they fit the description.
These are the suggested next 12 DCs, no speakers are suggested. They take into account movie screening and/or alternative modes of presentation to break the monotony.
Sem 1, after term break:
5) "Movie"-screening: documentaries about Buddhism, albeit from secular productions. E.g. that National Geographic documentary on Tibetan Buddhism (available on googlepages), etc. followed by facilitated sharing.
6) Finding happiness in life: Introducing the First and Second Noble Truths, applied to modern life, it involves analysing the obstructions that prevent us from being happy.
7) The causes of happiness. The Second Noble Truth is presented in terms of Aversion and Clinging, and hence the antidote is presented in terms of two aspects of Right Action: developing kindness by not harming others, and developing generosity as a counter to coveting what is not given.
8) Buddhism and Science: explores the popular claim nowadays that Buddhism is scientific. Presents parallel ideas between Buddhism and Science in terms of modern Physics and Biology, and explores the pitfalls of latest trend in this direction.
Sem 2, before term break:
9) Kamma: the Buddhist view
10) Living for a good death
11) Right effort
12) [Empty. Suggestions? We can do something about the Buddhist model of psychology or mind and matter here, but needs to be engaging and not dry]
Sem 2, after term break:
13) Documentary sharing: Meditation
14) Good communication habits, good relationships: Right Speech
15) Career choices and pains: Right livelihood
16) Buddhist travel sites (idea is to have sharing by Darryl)
We've also tried to put together a list of speakers. The criteria is for dynamic, engaging speakers that are really good and make people come back for more. We have a limited list so we'd welcome any suggestions.
Today Puay Kim, Shiongwei, Hidayat and I met up at National Library to mull over a whole series of Dharma Circle topics for next 2 semesters. We took into account Meifei, Angita and Tionghan's suggested topics.
So the next 4 DC topics aimed at incoming freshmen and returning members are:
1) Transitions in Life
Specifically dealing with the transition to University Life. Though not overtly harping on Buddhism as the panacea, the speaker will share on her own experiences on life's transitions, the mindset changes involved, and how to she helped herself with Dharma.
Suggested speaker: Cindy
2) What is Buddhism?
Specifically pitched at an audience with zero knowledge of Buddhism. The ideal end point is to clarify Buddhism in a modern way that is relevant to the audience so that they can come and find out more.
Suggested speaker: Kwek
3) Fact or Fiction: Tales of the Buddha
Introducing the life of the Buddha as a continuation from the previous topic. Different snapshots of various scenes from traditional stories of the Buddha will be brought up for discussion. With pictures of pilgrimages to present historical evidence to contrast against seemingly mythical accounts, the speaker will explore deeper meanings behind these stories.
Suggested speaker: Shiongwei
4) Calmness amidst the Stress
Mindfulness and living in the present moment is one of the top selling products of Buddhism. The speaker will share on the calmness factor in Buddhism: how it can help to keep the student in balance and equanimity amidst the building stress ahead of the first mid-term tests and looming projects.
Suggested speaker: Wee Heng
Those are NOT the actual titles, just the theme of the topic. More sexy titles are welcome as long as they fit the description.
These are the suggested next 12 DCs, no speakers are suggested. They take into account movie screening and/or alternative modes of presentation to break the monotony.
Sem 1, after term break:
5) "Movie"-screening: documentaries about Buddhism, albeit from secular productions. E.g. that National Geographic documentary on Tibetan Buddhism (available on googlepages), etc. followed by facilitated sharing.
6) Finding happiness in life: Introducing the First and Second Noble Truths, applied to modern life, it involves analysing the obstructions that prevent us from being happy.
7) The causes of happiness. The Second Noble Truth is presented in terms of Aversion and Clinging, and hence the antidote is presented in terms of two aspects of Right Action: developing kindness by not harming others, and developing generosity as a counter to coveting what is not given.
8) Buddhism and Science: explores the popular claim nowadays that Buddhism is scientific. Presents parallel ideas between Buddhism and Science in terms of modern Physics and Biology, and explores the pitfalls of latest trend in this direction.
Sem 2, before term break:
9) Kamma: the Buddhist view
10) Living for a good death
11) Right effort
12) [Empty. Suggestions? We can do something about the Buddhist model of psychology or mind and matter here, but needs to be engaging and not dry]
Sem 2, after term break:
13) Documentary sharing: Meditation
14) Good communication habits, good relationships: Right Speech
15) Career choices and pains: Right livelihood
16) Buddhist travel sites (idea is to have sharing by Darryl)
We've also tried to put together a list of speakers. The criteria is for dynamic, engaging speakers that are really good and make people come back for more. We have a limited list so we'd welcome any suggestions.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Another round of meetings
Okay peeps this will be a summary of four meetings: (1) with Billy, on the subject of the Poly Buddhist Societies; (2) with Tionghan; (3) with Meihui; (4) with the Provost of NUS Prof Tan Eng Chye. As usual, since this public domain I shall water down many things.
(1) Billy
Billy is the Chairperson of the United Polytechnic’s Buddhist Council. So I looked for him to try and get an idea of how the Poly BSs operate. The picture he painted was quite bad.
The strongest by opinion is NYPBS. Much of this can be attributed to the strong presence of their alumni. NYPBS is the only Poly BS that is registered under ROS, and their alumni are the ones handling all the administrative matters. As such, the alumni has a lot of say in what activities the NYPBS committee can or cannot implement. The juniors have felt that they are quite restricted by the alumni. While on one hand the alumni offers protection for the society, on the other hand the burden on the alumni is heavy as they feel they have to answer to ROS. This year’s committee has clashed quite badly with the alumni and there have been fall-outs over this.
The alumni influence of SPBS has waned over the years, as the seniors have gone their separate ways.
The weakest currently is NPBS. This year, NPBS’s president is from Myanmar, bringing from the country its conservative approach will cannot fit in with the Singapore situation. Obviously this has repercussions on the whole flavor of the society, and Billy’s description is that nobody really knows what the society is doing anymore, or perhaps it’s not even doing anything.
There are many similarities between the challenges that the Poly and Uni BSs are facing. Increased foreigner proportions and declining local interest is a major problem. Academics are placed first, as the best students are fighting for those limited places in the universities. As such, the BS has become a place to earn CCA points to bump up their resume for university entry. Billy’s opinion is that since Religious Knowledge was abolished in secondary schools, everything slid downhill.
The most shocking contrast that I learnt about the Poly BSs with the two Uni BSs was that there was absolutely no framework of activities to pass down from one generation to the next. It is totally up to the new committee to think about what activities to organize. In the case of NYPBS, of course, this was usually met with scrutiny from the alumni. Whereas for us, we might feel that the suite of weekly and yearly activities handed down to us are a burden because we feel obliged to offer the full spectrum of services as our predecessors did, their incoming committees have totally no framework to work within, which leaves the possibility of an empty shell with no activities going on.
Most activities in the past are jumping on to ongoing external activities, or speakers are invited once in a while for talks. Some of them also used to conduct their weekly pujas, but this was dependent on the ‘flavour’ of the current committee. The senior-organise-for-junior PBS camp ended in 2006 and has not been continued since.
(2) Tionghan
1. He felt that his committee was very loose, unbonded. He compared it to the 28th MC, where he felt that we were more fun. I reminded him that much of the 28th continued on from the 27th, so we were already familiar with each other. However, the make-up of his committee really leaves much to be desired, especially on the level of commitment that they gave.
One of the main problems of this committee was their lack of willingness to express their opinion or voice out their concerns against others. Despite having told him to be ‘frank but tactful’ during handover last year, they have not managed to come to the required level of maturity or trust with each other to voice out their unhappiness, their criticism or their problems with certain ideas or initiatives that others were coming out with. Primarily this is a communication problem.
2. He felt that the deputy secretary was a redundant post. Kok Seong was absent or uncontactable much of the time, doing only minimal work which was not really done well. Yuven, however, could cope on her own. Having said that, Yuven herself seemed to be much committed to her studies and outside events, in contrast with our interview with her before their AGM, when she assured that she had only BS as an activity.
Hidayat and I have discussed in the past about the requirement for a dedicated post to deal with public relations. We had suggested this to be the Fellowship Director. Unfortunately, David has not taken up this role. Given the perceived redundancy of the deputy secretary by Tionghan, the often unclear role of a Fellowship director and the need for a PR liaison, perhaps it is really time to review the portfolios in the MC positions.
3. Tionghan’s observation was that they had organized more activities, but there was an obvious drop in the number of people coming to activities. This is despite an overall larger membership than the 28th. His original aim for the year was for more diversified forms of activities and more collaboration with outside organizations. He felt that this was achieved. However, I pointed out to him that this may have been at the expense of the health of the committee and the turnout for each activity. At 7 days a week, both psychologically and temporally we only have a limited ‘budget’ to offer activities. Hence diversification is sometimes not as all beneficial as it seems. My conclusion is that the new committees, especially the President, must be impressed upon of this rule: if you are bent on introducing a new activity, be prepared to scrap an old activity to free up people, time and mental stress. There is no such thing as keeping your old cake and eating a new one.
Comments on DC:
-He brought up the very valid point that some of the alumni speakers were not steady enough. The problem was not a lack of Dharma knowledge on the speaker’s side. The problem was the inability to speak convincingly or charismatically such that the audience is satisfied. Leaving some questions open ended is inevitable in Buddhism, but it has to be done in a way that does not increase the audiences’ skepticism of the Dharma, or make the audience feel that the speaker actually does not know. So, skill in leaving questions open is needed. As such, it made the committee feel that perhaps calling Venerables in would offer more authority.
-On the side of the Dharma Friends, he feels that their interest is already there, i.e. they are already ‘Dharmic’. However, they were not inspired as a group. There was a lacking of spiritual fellowship among the Dharma Friends. There was also a lack of facilitation experience. Somehow, it was felt that the discussions in DC just did not reach the depth and breadth of the informal ‘dinner Dharma’ discussions that we have with one another, which I suppose is the actual idea that Dharma Circle is formulated on.
He suggests a ratio of 10 discussion style DCs for every 6 talk-styled. This is close to Angita’s suggestion. The following four topics were suggested (note the similarity to Angita’s):
-Dealing with school life and its challenges
-Buddhism and happiness for YOUNG people: how to find happiness?
-Friendship and fellowship: how to make friends.
-That calmness factor in Buddhism.
(3) Meihui
There was some difficulty trying to dig things out of her, probably in retrospect because she was sort of (consciously or unconsciously) on a defensive psychological posture against me because she thought that she would quarrel with me. We did explore some interesting points though.
1. She has tried to bring more Dharma among the MC by making it mandatory for them to attend the two-session Basic Buddhism Course and the Eight Precepts Day. Whether or not they have benefitted from it, she would not want to comment. I made it clear to her that I felt BBC and 8 precepts are wonderful ideas, but would they be adding burden to the already taxed committee? Her defence was that they agreed (or did not object?) to these and she even felt that they were quite enthusiastic on it initially. And they did cut the BBC to 2 sessions from 4 or 6 originally planned.
2. She admits a breakdown of communication with her deputy.
3. Finally, something interesting. She blurted out that she got quite ‘pek cek’ over time as she could not feel the reciprocation of the MC over her efforts, and a lack of bonding. Gradually it felt to her that she was begging people to come. This led to tiredness and eroded motivation by the end of the first semester. The same feeling that she had with the 28th was just not there. This is how I analysed it with her: her teammates’ lack of commitment led to a chronic stress situation. In semester two, with her academic and other mixed stresses coming in as an acute source of stress, she snapped. Luckily this occurred when only 2 or 3 more DCs were left.
I told frankly that I had expected Dharma to perform much better than average for the 29th given herself, Tionghan and Angita. However, in my opinion, they had only just done average: enough to get by. So the overall verdict by me is that they could have done so much better, so it was a disappointing year on the Dharma side.
-On Dharma Friends, she felt that there were too little DF workshops. While they did try to do some trial run DCs before the actual day among the 3 or 4 DFs that turned up for the DF meetings, nobody was there to feedback or to improve their facilitation skills, i.e. they were just playing lego by themselves.
She also suggests the ratio of 3 discussion styles to 1 talk. Her suggestions for the next 4 topics:
-Buddhist Youth-fulness: What makes a Buddhist youth different from other youths? To get an inspirational speaker to fire up the audience about the idea of being a youth equipped with Buddhism.
-Transitions in life: How Buddhism can help in such situations, especially when mindset changes are needed.
-Magnanimity of the heart: spreading kindness and maintaining that equanimity of caring for others for all situations and people.
- Strengthening our fragile heart.
(4) Provost
We paid a visit to the Provost’s office today at 4.45pm. As expected, he’s a busy man with back-to-back meetings, so seeing that he looked at his watch, me and Tionghan decided to cut it short.
There are 2 open motives to meet with the Provost: 1) For him to know us better; 2) For us to know him better. There is one covert motive: to drop hints for him to be one of our staff patrons in the future.
The takeaway from the meet up was that he doesn’t really know much about the Buddhist world outside. He doesn’t know of the organizations Palelai, Wat Ananda or Buddhist Fellowship. The most likely reason is that he’s too busy with his other portfolios to devote extensive energies into any Dharma work.
He has been the Chairman of Sattha Puchaniyaram Buddhist Temple in Bukit Batok since the 90’s. His link to the temple began since his childhood days as part of his family activities. The Venerable of the temple is already in his 90s, very old, and very conservative, not interested in succession. For himself, he has tried to float the idea of injecting some youth and reversing the decline of the temple in recent years, but has met with lukewarm response or even some tension.
He asked us if we knew of Bro. Kwek Soon Han. He had met Bro. Kwek and is thinking of trying to get in touch of similar experienced people or groups that can advise him of how to move forward in his scenario. But our assessment is that he is likely to take it slowly, especially with his commitments, his lack of familiarity with the Buddhist world outside and his unwillingness to antagonize a Venerable that he has respected from young.
We introduced some of the activities and the state of our membership. He seems to think that our current performance is considered pretty good. He also asked with a smile how the Christian groups in NUS are performing. We told him of BF@NUS and the existence of Tzu Ching. However, due to his lack of time we could not get too far before we had to end the meet up.
We passed him the past 2 years’ LOW as a souvenir and used it as an excuse to bring future elected Presidents to him to present coming LOWs. I’ve also passed him the bookmark from the Buddhist Youth Conference that we are organizing in August, and let him know the objectives of this conference. He asked to be updated about the schedule of the conference. We also offered our help if he needed advice or contacts with the rejuvenation of his temple in the future.
Takeback: currently he’s not in any state to render us much support. More rather, he might even need our help, except that he probably doesn’t know how much we can help him. However, we should definitely keep in touch with him, invite him for Buddhist Society Night (which means that the benchmark has really got to be raised!!! for our performances) and slowly get him more familiar with us through successive meetings.
Would be meeting up with SIMBS and NTUBS if I can, so would post further thoughts after my meeting with them.
(1) Billy
Billy is the Chairperson of the United Polytechnic’s Buddhist Council. So I looked for him to try and get an idea of how the Poly BSs operate. The picture he painted was quite bad.
The strongest by opinion is NYPBS. Much of this can be attributed to the strong presence of their alumni. NYPBS is the only Poly BS that is registered under ROS, and their alumni are the ones handling all the administrative matters. As such, the alumni has a lot of say in what activities the NYPBS committee can or cannot implement. The juniors have felt that they are quite restricted by the alumni. While on one hand the alumni offers protection for the society, on the other hand the burden on the alumni is heavy as they feel they have to answer to ROS. This year’s committee has clashed quite badly with the alumni and there have been fall-outs over this.
The alumni influence of SPBS has waned over the years, as the seniors have gone their separate ways.
The weakest currently is NPBS. This year, NPBS’s president is from Myanmar, bringing from the country its conservative approach will cannot fit in with the Singapore situation. Obviously this has repercussions on the whole flavor of the society, and Billy’s description is that nobody really knows what the society is doing anymore, or perhaps it’s not even doing anything.
There are many similarities between the challenges that the Poly and Uni BSs are facing. Increased foreigner proportions and declining local interest is a major problem. Academics are placed first, as the best students are fighting for those limited places in the universities. As such, the BS has become a place to earn CCA points to bump up their resume for university entry. Billy’s opinion is that since Religious Knowledge was abolished in secondary schools, everything slid downhill.
The most shocking contrast that I learnt about the Poly BSs with the two Uni BSs was that there was absolutely no framework of activities to pass down from one generation to the next. It is totally up to the new committee to think about what activities to organize. In the case of NYPBS, of course, this was usually met with scrutiny from the alumni. Whereas for us, we might feel that the suite of weekly and yearly activities handed down to us are a burden because we feel obliged to offer the full spectrum of services as our predecessors did, their incoming committees have totally no framework to work within, which leaves the possibility of an empty shell with no activities going on.
Most activities in the past are jumping on to ongoing external activities, or speakers are invited once in a while for talks. Some of them also used to conduct their weekly pujas, but this was dependent on the ‘flavour’ of the current committee. The senior-organise-for-junior PBS camp ended in 2006 and has not been continued since.
(2) Tionghan
1. He felt that his committee was very loose, unbonded. He compared it to the 28th MC, where he felt that we were more fun. I reminded him that much of the 28th continued on from the 27th, so we were already familiar with each other. However, the make-up of his committee really leaves much to be desired, especially on the level of commitment that they gave.
One of the main problems of this committee was their lack of willingness to express their opinion or voice out their concerns against others. Despite having told him to be ‘frank but tactful’ during handover last year, they have not managed to come to the required level of maturity or trust with each other to voice out their unhappiness, their criticism or their problems with certain ideas or initiatives that others were coming out with. Primarily this is a communication problem.
2. He felt that the deputy secretary was a redundant post. Kok Seong was absent or uncontactable much of the time, doing only minimal work which was not really done well. Yuven, however, could cope on her own. Having said that, Yuven herself seemed to be much committed to her studies and outside events, in contrast with our interview with her before their AGM, when she assured that she had only BS as an activity.
Hidayat and I have discussed in the past about the requirement for a dedicated post to deal with public relations. We had suggested this to be the Fellowship Director. Unfortunately, David has not taken up this role. Given the perceived redundancy of the deputy secretary by Tionghan, the often unclear role of a Fellowship director and the need for a PR liaison, perhaps it is really time to review the portfolios in the MC positions.
3. Tionghan’s observation was that they had organized more activities, but there was an obvious drop in the number of people coming to activities. This is despite an overall larger membership than the 28th. His original aim for the year was for more diversified forms of activities and more collaboration with outside organizations. He felt that this was achieved. However, I pointed out to him that this may have been at the expense of the health of the committee and the turnout for each activity. At 7 days a week, both psychologically and temporally we only have a limited ‘budget’ to offer activities. Hence diversification is sometimes not as all beneficial as it seems. My conclusion is that the new committees, especially the President, must be impressed upon of this rule: if you are bent on introducing a new activity, be prepared to scrap an old activity to free up people, time and mental stress. There is no such thing as keeping your old cake and eating a new one.
Comments on DC:
-He brought up the very valid point that some of the alumni speakers were not steady enough. The problem was not a lack of Dharma knowledge on the speaker’s side. The problem was the inability to speak convincingly or charismatically such that the audience is satisfied. Leaving some questions open ended is inevitable in Buddhism, but it has to be done in a way that does not increase the audiences’ skepticism of the Dharma, or make the audience feel that the speaker actually does not know. So, skill in leaving questions open is needed. As such, it made the committee feel that perhaps calling Venerables in would offer more authority.
-On the side of the Dharma Friends, he feels that their interest is already there, i.e. they are already ‘Dharmic’. However, they were not inspired as a group. There was a lacking of spiritual fellowship among the Dharma Friends. There was also a lack of facilitation experience. Somehow, it was felt that the discussions in DC just did not reach the depth and breadth of the informal ‘dinner Dharma’ discussions that we have with one another, which I suppose is the actual idea that Dharma Circle is formulated on.
He suggests a ratio of 10 discussion style DCs for every 6 talk-styled. This is close to Angita’s suggestion. The following four topics were suggested (note the similarity to Angita’s):
-Dealing with school life and its challenges
-Buddhism and happiness for YOUNG people: how to find happiness?
-Friendship and fellowship: how to make friends.
-That calmness factor in Buddhism.
(3) Meihui
There was some difficulty trying to dig things out of her, probably in retrospect because she was sort of (consciously or unconsciously) on a defensive psychological posture against me because she thought that she would quarrel with me. We did explore some interesting points though.
1. She has tried to bring more Dharma among the MC by making it mandatory for them to attend the two-session Basic Buddhism Course and the Eight Precepts Day. Whether or not they have benefitted from it, she would not want to comment. I made it clear to her that I felt BBC and 8 precepts are wonderful ideas, but would they be adding burden to the already taxed committee? Her defence was that they agreed (or did not object?) to these and she even felt that they were quite enthusiastic on it initially. And they did cut the BBC to 2 sessions from 4 or 6 originally planned.
2. She admits a breakdown of communication with her deputy.
3. Finally, something interesting. She blurted out that she got quite ‘pek cek’ over time as she could not feel the reciprocation of the MC over her efforts, and a lack of bonding. Gradually it felt to her that she was begging people to come. This led to tiredness and eroded motivation by the end of the first semester. The same feeling that she had with the 28th was just not there. This is how I analysed it with her: her teammates’ lack of commitment led to a chronic stress situation. In semester two, with her academic and other mixed stresses coming in as an acute source of stress, she snapped. Luckily this occurred when only 2 or 3 more DCs were left.
I told frankly that I had expected Dharma to perform much better than average for the 29th given herself, Tionghan and Angita. However, in my opinion, they had only just done average: enough to get by. So the overall verdict by me is that they could have done so much better, so it was a disappointing year on the Dharma side.
-On Dharma Friends, she felt that there were too little DF workshops. While they did try to do some trial run DCs before the actual day among the 3 or 4 DFs that turned up for the DF meetings, nobody was there to feedback or to improve their facilitation skills, i.e. they were just playing lego by themselves.
She also suggests the ratio of 3 discussion styles to 1 talk. Her suggestions for the next 4 topics:
-Buddhist Youth-fulness: What makes a Buddhist youth different from other youths? To get an inspirational speaker to fire up the audience about the idea of being a youth equipped with Buddhism.
-Transitions in life: How Buddhism can help in such situations, especially when mindset changes are needed.
-Magnanimity of the heart: spreading kindness and maintaining that equanimity of caring for others for all situations and people.
- Strengthening our fragile heart.
(4) Provost
We paid a visit to the Provost’s office today at 4.45pm. As expected, he’s a busy man with back-to-back meetings, so seeing that he looked at his watch, me and Tionghan decided to cut it short.
There are 2 open motives to meet with the Provost: 1) For him to know us better; 2) For us to know him better. There is one covert motive: to drop hints for him to be one of our staff patrons in the future.
The takeaway from the meet up was that he doesn’t really know much about the Buddhist world outside. He doesn’t know of the organizations Palelai, Wat Ananda or Buddhist Fellowship. The most likely reason is that he’s too busy with his other portfolios to devote extensive energies into any Dharma work.
He has been the Chairman of Sattha Puchaniyaram Buddhist Temple in Bukit Batok since the 90’s. His link to the temple began since his childhood days as part of his family activities. The Venerable of the temple is already in his 90s, very old, and very conservative, not interested in succession. For himself, he has tried to float the idea of injecting some youth and reversing the decline of the temple in recent years, but has met with lukewarm response or even some tension.
He asked us if we knew of Bro. Kwek Soon Han. He had met Bro. Kwek and is thinking of trying to get in touch of similar experienced people or groups that can advise him of how to move forward in his scenario. But our assessment is that he is likely to take it slowly, especially with his commitments, his lack of familiarity with the Buddhist world outside and his unwillingness to antagonize a Venerable that he has respected from young.
We introduced some of the activities and the state of our membership. He seems to think that our current performance is considered pretty good. He also asked with a smile how the Christian groups in NUS are performing. We told him of BF@NUS and the existence of Tzu Ching. However, due to his lack of time we could not get too far before we had to end the meet up.
We passed him the past 2 years’ LOW as a souvenir and used it as an excuse to bring future elected Presidents to him to present coming LOWs. I’ve also passed him the bookmark from the Buddhist Youth Conference that we are organizing in August, and let him know the objectives of this conference. He asked to be updated about the schedule of the conference. We also offered our help if he needed advice or contacts with the rejuvenation of his temple in the future.
Takeback: currently he’s not in any state to render us much support. More rather, he might even need our help, except that he probably doesn’t know how much we can help him. However, we should definitely keep in touch with him, invite him for Buddhist Society Night (which means that the benchmark has really got to be raised!!! for our performances) and slowly get him more familiar with us through successive meetings.
Would be meeting up with SIMBS and NTUBS if I can, so would post further thoughts after my meeting with them.
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
Dharma In Action - Buddhist Youth Conference 2008
Calling all engaged Buddhist youths and Buddhist Youth Leaders!
You believe in Buddhism and its value to today's society. You have always thought of doing more for Buddhism and you are constantly seeking new channels to reach out and share the wonderful Teachings.
Dharma In Action: Buddhist Youth Conference 2008 (www.dharmainaction.net) will be a platform for all Buddhists to gather and share experiences in organizing Buddhist activities and Dharma propagation. On 23 August 2008, we will be discussing milestone Buddhist events organized both in Singapore and overseas. Major lessons learnt will be shared together with the ups and downs of organizing such activities. The speakers will also be sharing with us on their motivations and what keep them going.
Following lunch, we will continue our discussion on the various efforts expended by Buddhists in both music and entrepreneurship. We will explore music and its role in Dharma propagation. We will also be speaking to Buddhists who are entrepreneurs to hear their thoughts on how Buddhism helps them in their businesses.
If you are looking to meet like-minded Buddhist youths or seeking new ideas in Dharma propagation, join us at the conference!
For more details on the event, please log into our website at www.DharmaInAction.net or contact the following:
Bro Victor Lim
9852-2492
sadhu@singnet.com.sg
Bro Teo Puay Kim
9820-7295
puaykim@gmail.com
You believe in Buddhism and its value to today's society. You have always thought of doing more for Buddhism and you are constantly seeking new channels to reach out and share the wonderful Teachings.
Dharma In Action: Buddhist Youth Conference 2008 (www.dharmainaction.net) will be a platform for all Buddhists to gather and share experiences in organizing Buddhist activities and Dharma propagation. On 23 August 2008, we will be discussing milestone Buddhist events organized both in Singapore and overseas. Major lessons learnt will be shared together with the ups and downs of organizing such activities. The speakers will also be sharing with us on their motivations and what keep them going.
Following lunch, we will continue our discussion on the various efforts expended by Buddhists in both music and entrepreneurship. We will explore music and its role in Dharma propagation. We will also be speaking to Buddhists who are entrepreneurs to hear their thoughts on how Buddhism helps them in their businesses.
If you are looking to meet like-minded Buddhist youths or seeking new ideas in Dharma propagation, join us at the conference!
For more details on the event, please log into our website at www.DharmaInAction.net or contact the following:
Bro Victor Lim
9852-2492
sadhu@singnet.com.sg
Bro Teo Puay Kim
9820-7295
puaykim@gmail.com
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Where are the entrepreneurs?
In response to the insight that Kwek has gained from his interview with Angita, I think that whether it is 1 year or 2 years Dhamma Circle, it doesn’t really matter. The main issue that I can pick out from the discussion is that:
1.1. How to reduce the workload of the Directors and the members who are organizing it? And the meaning of work that need to be addressed each year, basically, the big M word, Motivation.
2. 2. The second issue, which I personally and consistently have been bringing up over my 3 years in NUSBS, possibly due to my engineering background, is the big N issue, Number.
So now we have M and N, M for Motivation and N for Number.
Let me extend the concept of M and N a little bit…
NUSBS will turn 30 years next year and seems that things have not been improving much since the time when the number of Buddhists is dwindling over the years and converted to other religions or free-thinker in Singapore. Buddhists are seen as old-fashioned and people who always do chanting non-stop and 3 steps one bow to get good academic results.
The following idea that I am presenting could be provocative and offensive, therefore I would like to apologize first and I will try to be as polite as possible. For the past 4-5 years, the key personnel of NUSBS is actually the Dharma Director. I believe that the people who are altruistic, good heart, good practice and the conservatives belong to the M group. While the people who always think of new things and ideas and working towards modernization belong to the N group. Certainly, there are those who are belong to the both groups but they are the minority. However, the sad thing is that we have always been coming to the stage where the M is always in the opposite with the N.
As long as the M is always more dominant than the N in the society, the number of members will reach a steady state or in fact from history, it actually decreases. Well, M group will challenge this idea by saying that number is not important and what matters most is the heart and the motivation, that’s why they belong to the M group and that’s why the current NUSBS will remain as NUSBS for the next 5-10 years to come.
What I’m proposing is that the N people should be trained and developed as well. We are always talking about developing Dharma friends and facilitators. Those training will only develop mainly the M group and not the N group. Certainly, developing “Dharma friends” program could include development of the N people as well. And the most important thing to be able to qualify as N personnel, is the ability to present, sell and market. Ask any of the Gates or the Jobs out there, if you cannot sell, you will never succeed. You may have the best technology in the market, but if you cannot sell, it will just go down to the drain, quickly.
In summary, an electron discovered by scientist will remain as electron. An engineer makes it into a super computer so that I can type and post my thoughts here. But without the entrepreneurial minded people who brings this technology in the stores and bring down the cost, I would probably just view it as a luxury item belong to the upper class. The Buddha is the scientist, the Sangha is the engineer, where are the entrepreneurs then?
Thank you,
Kosiyo
Monday, May 5, 2008
Some post-exam updates
Hi ghouls of the dharmarountable! 法圆桌的恶鬼果然阴魂不散！
I'd be meeting up with some of the key personnel of the 29th MC and some past seniors for a chat. For starters last week I met up with Kenny and today I met up with Angita.
Summary of meeting with Angita (of course certain information will not be broadcasted here):
My purpose was to find out on an informal basis her reflections （感想） comparing her pre-MC and post-MC mentalities and her suggestions for the near future. Her insights actually hit the nail quite on the head, at least in my opinion.
1. While as a participant in year 1, she and yuven very much look forward to weekly Dharma Circles as a form of gathering/meaningful 'entertainment'. They would always set aside Fridays for DC and would even ask each other what are the topics this week, etc. Not only was it a time to relieve stress, there was also something to be learnt, to be gained.
However, upon becoming MC, DCs and all BS activities suddenly become viewed as work. Because now the paradigm is from that of an organiser, (a) there are no surprises - she knows what's going to happen next, in contrast to eager anticipation as a participant; (b) she sees all the imperfections, screw-ups, mismanagement of time, etc, which she finds spoils her whole experience as compared to as a participant, where everything seemed 'perfect'.
2. Before being in the MC, she was not quite aware of the actual workload that was behind the running of those activities that she had been having fun in. The very first day of taking over already overwhelmed her. From then on burnt out followed pretty quickly.
The above 2 are the main points. Succession, committee dynamics and her own working relationship with the DD will not be discussed here.
Some comments that she mentioned for future DCs.
- we agreed that the frequency of talks versus discussion group style has become overly frequent. We agreed that the quantity of 4 DCs before term break and 4 DCs after term break for a total of 8 per semester, 16 per academic year is ideal. We agreed on a ratio of 3 Discussions to 1 Talk for each set of 4 DCs. Discussion can involve participants and is less heavy.
- 'movie'-screening should become a permanent feature of DCs. Frequency suggested is once per semester. 'Movies' need not be actually movies - documentaries or even short Dharma Talks can be used, as long as they are followed with discussion. The purpose is to add some audio-visual variety to the presentation method of DCs: not always a real speaker in front.
- the latest 'mind series' of DCs may have seen heavy topics, but my response was that it may have been the choice of speakers and method of presentation that made it seem heavy (i.e. it would have been less heavy if it were discussion style). However, it is agreed that a series of 4 related DCs such as the latest 'mind series' is a good package, in terms of marketing and content. There would be continuity that regulars can look forward to.
- old ghost that resurfaced: the need for any 'syllabus' in the topics of Dharma Circles versus the repetition of topics. I described to her the original plan formulated at the end of the 27th, executed in the 28th (to a limited extent), and not passed down to the 29th: 16-20 'technical' topics to be cycled through 2 years.
- non-'technical' topics may seem quite broad, but hence is their viability to be repeated each year. Suggestion is to highlight one aspect of the broad topic this year, and highlight another part the next year.
Her suggested next 4 DCs:
- Transforming into an Undergrad student
- Buddhadharma for University LIfe
- What is Buddhism? (Broad topic, this time introducing Buddhism in a nutshell as modern living)
- Present moment (Buddhism's best selling product in the urbanised, globalised, modernised world: mindfulness)
Prior to my meeting with her, a short discussion with Puay Kim was to design a whole year's worth of DC topics and speakers to hand over on a platter to the DD, who will make changes as they deem fit. The purpose was to release the DD and DDD to concentrate on developing the DFs and the Dharma subcomm. But upon discussion with Angita apparently it may even be advantageous to design 2 year's worth of DC topics (as per suggested at the end of the 27th).
I would update on Kenny another time. Kenny happens to be in the 24th MC, same as Gordon. I would make arrangements to meet up with Siling for a chat too.
I'd be meeting up with some of the key personnel of the 29th MC and some past seniors for a chat. For starters last week I met up with Kenny and today I met up with Angita.
Summary of meeting with Angita (of course certain information will not be broadcasted here):
My purpose was to find out on an informal basis her reflections （感想） comparing her pre-MC and post-MC mentalities and her suggestions for the near future. Her insights actually hit the nail quite on the head, at least in my opinion.
1. While as a participant in year 1, she and yuven very much look forward to weekly Dharma Circles as a form of gathering/meaningful 'entertainment'. They would always set aside Fridays for DC and would even ask each other what are the topics this week, etc. Not only was it a time to relieve stress, there was also something to be learnt, to be gained.
However, upon becoming MC, DCs and all BS activities suddenly become viewed as work. Because now the paradigm is from that of an organiser, (a) there are no surprises - she knows what's going to happen next, in contrast to eager anticipation as a participant; (b) she sees all the imperfections, screw-ups, mismanagement of time, etc, which she finds spoils her whole experience as compared to as a participant, where everything seemed 'perfect'.
2. Before being in the MC, she was not quite aware of the actual workload that was behind the running of those activities that she had been having fun in. The very first day of taking over already overwhelmed her. From then on burnt out followed pretty quickly.
The above 2 are the main points. Succession, committee dynamics and her own working relationship with the DD will not be discussed here.
Some comments that she mentioned for future DCs.
- we agreed that the frequency of talks versus discussion group style has become overly frequent. We agreed that the quantity of 4 DCs before term break and 4 DCs after term break for a total of 8 per semester, 16 per academic year is ideal. We agreed on a ratio of 3 Discussions to 1 Talk for each set of 4 DCs. Discussion can involve participants and is less heavy.
- 'movie'-screening should become a permanent feature of DCs. Frequency suggested is once per semester. 'Movies' need not be actually movies - documentaries or even short Dharma Talks can be used, as long as they are followed with discussion. The purpose is to add some audio-visual variety to the presentation method of DCs: not always a real speaker in front.
- the latest 'mind series' of DCs may have seen heavy topics, but my response was that it may have been the choice of speakers and method of presentation that made it seem heavy (i.e. it would have been less heavy if it were discussion style). However, it is agreed that a series of 4 related DCs such as the latest 'mind series' is a good package, in terms of marketing and content. There would be continuity that regulars can look forward to.
- old ghost that resurfaced: the need for any 'syllabus' in the topics of Dharma Circles versus the repetition of topics. I described to her the original plan formulated at the end of the 27th, executed in the 28th (to a limited extent), and not passed down to the 29th: 16-20 'technical' topics to be cycled through 2 years.
- non-'technical' topics may seem quite broad, but hence is their viability to be repeated each year. Suggestion is to highlight one aspect of the broad topic this year, and highlight another part the next year.
Her suggested next 4 DCs:
- Transforming into an Undergrad student
- Buddhadharma for University LIfe
- What is Buddhism? (Broad topic, this time introducing Buddhism in a nutshell as modern living)
- Present moment (Buddhism's best selling product in the urbanised, globalised, modernised world: mindfulness)
Prior to my meeting with her, a short discussion with Puay Kim was to design a whole year's worth of DC topics and speakers to hand over on a platter to the DD, who will make changes as they deem fit. The purpose was to release the DD and DDD to concentrate on developing the DFs and the Dharma subcomm. But upon discussion with Angita apparently it may even be advantageous to design 2 year's worth of DC topics (as per suggested at the end of the 27th).
I would update on Kenny another time. Kenny happens to be in the 24th MC, same as Gordon. I would make arrangements to meet up with Siling for a chat too.
Sunday, May 4, 2008
A Walk to Wat Ananda
Today is a special day. After i woke up from my sleep, suddenly, arose an urge to attend Sunday Service. Wat Ananda came to my mind. After making myself a fragrant coffee and eating one "Sunshine" blueberry bread, i made my way to the temple.
The feeling is mixed. I did not understand why. It was a long time since i last chanted or listened to a Dhamma Talk. Throughout the session, i did not pay much attention to the activities, but observed my emotions rising and falling. The mind is overwhelmed. After a period of time, the mind started to become calm. I remembered this feeling, a stream of peacefulness ran all over your body. An inner voice shouted: "Wow..."
Lastly, the melody of Metta chant really did the magic. For me, it had been so long since i listened to Metta chant, fabulous, totally made me immersed in it and totally calm down. However, it was short lived, i hoped it can be longer. Until now, i realized the power of togetherness in a group. The magnetic feel is wonderful. It was certainly hard to achieve in a room with myself sitting alone.
After the whole session, i took three Dhamma books written by Ven K. Rathanara from Sri Langkaramaya Temple (today's speaker). I had one of the best Hainan Chicken Rice recorded in my dictionary near the temple and decided to finish the books and returned back. The hot weather drove me crazy. In the end, i went back to the temple and read under the Bodhi Tree. The shade made me feel cool and it was so nice to read under it on this special Sunday morning.
Finally, i finished reading the books: (1) Healthy thoughts (for children, sourced from Sri Langka children's book); (2) The Art of Giving; (3) How to maintain a healthy relationship.
A great activity for clearing all the negative emotions that had been accummulated for so long. Most importantly, it was so relaxing and i had fun doing it.
Shiok...
The feeling is mixed. I did not understand why. It was a long time since i last chanted or listened to a Dhamma Talk. Throughout the session, i did not pay much attention to the activities, but observed my emotions rising and falling. The mind is overwhelmed. After a period of time, the mind started to become calm. I remembered this feeling, a stream of peacefulness ran all over your body. An inner voice shouted: "Wow..."
Lastly, the melody of Metta chant really did the magic. For me, it had been so long since i listened to Metta chant, fabulous, totally made me immersed in it and totally calm down. However, it was short lived, i hoped it can be longer. Until now, i realized the power of togetherness in a group. The magnetic feel is wonderful. It was certainly hard to achieve in a room with myself sitting alone.
After the whole session, i took three Dhamma books written by Ven K. Rathanara from Sri Langkaramaya Temple (today's speaker). I had one of the best Hainan Chicken Rice recorded in my dictionary near the temple and decided to finish the books and returned back. The hot weather drove me crazy. In the end, i went back to the temple and read under the Bodhi Tree. The shade made me feel cool and it was so nice to read under it on this special Sunday morning.
Finally, i finished reading the books: (1) Healthy thoughts (for children, sourced from Sri Langka children's book); (2) The Art of Giving; (3) How to maintain a healthy relationship.
A great activity for clearing all the negative emotions that had been accummulated for so long. Most importantly, it was so relaxing and i had fun doing it.
Shiok...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)